|
Barraga, N. (1983). Visual
handicaps and learning. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed,
Inc.
Barton, K. E. & Huynh, H.
(2000). Patterns of errors made on a reading
test with oral reading administration. Paper
presented at the annual conference of the National
Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans,
LA.
Beattie, S., Grise, P., &
Algozzine, B. (1983). Effects of test modifications
on the minimum competency performance of learning
disabled students. Learning Disability
Quarterly, 6, 75-77.
Bennett, R.E., Rock, D.A.,
& Jirele, T. (1987). GRE score level, test
completion, and reliability for visually impaired,
physically handicapped, and nonhandicapped groups.
The Journal of Special Education, 21 (3),
9-21.
Bennett, R.E., Rock, D.A.,
& Kaplan, B.A. (1987). SAT differential item
performance for nine handicapped groups. Journal
of Educational Measurement, 24 (1),
44-55.
Bennett, R.E., Rock, D.A.,
& Novatkoski, I. (1989). Differential item
functioning on the SAT-M Braille Edition.
Journal of Educational Measurement, 26 (1),
67-79.
Bielinski, J., Thurlow, M.,
Ysseldyke, J., Freidebach, J., & Freidebach, M.
(2001). Read-aloud accommodation: Effects on
multiple-choice reading & math items (Technical
Report 31). Minneapolis, MN: University of
Minnesota, National Center on Educational
Outcomes.
Bourquin, E.A. (1996). Using
interpreters with deaf-blind clients: What
professional service providers should know.
RE:view, 27 (4), 149-154.
Braden, J.P. (1992).
Intellectual assessment of deaf and hard-of-hearing
people: A quantitative and qualitative research
synthesis. School Psychology Review, 21 ,
82-94.
Burk, M. (1998, October).
Computerized test accommodations: A new approach
for inclusion and success for students with
disabilities. Paper presented at Office of
Special Education Program Cross Project Meeting
“Technology and the Education of Children with
Disabilities: Steppingstones to the 21st
Century.”
Burns, E. (1998) Test
accommodations for students with disabilities.
Springfield: Charles C. Thomas, Publisher,
LTD.
Calhoon, M.B., Fuchs, L.S.,
& Hamlett, C.L. (2000). Effects of
computer-based test accommodations on mathematics
performance assessments for secondary students with
learning disabilities. Learning Disability
Quarterly, 23, 271-282.
Centra, J.A. (1986).
Handicapped student performance on the Scholastic
Aptitude Test. Journal of Learning Disabilities,
19 (6), 324-327.
Chiu, C.W.T., Pearson, &
P. David (1999). Synthesizing the effects of
test accommodations for special education and
limited English proficiency students. Paper
presented at the National Conference on Large Scale
Assessment.
Coleman, P.J. (1990).
Exploring visually handicapped children’s
understanding of length (math concepts). (Doctoral
dissertation, The Florida State University, 1990).
Dissertation Abstracts International, 51,
0071.
Council for Exceptional
Children. Making assessment accommodations: A
toolkit for educators. Reston, VA: Council for
Exceptional Children.
DiCerbo, K., Stanley, E.,
Roberts, M., & Blanchard, J. (April, 2001).
Attention and standardized reading test
performance: Implications for accommodation.
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
National Association of School Psychologists,
Washington, DC, 2001.
Elliott, S., Kratochwill, T.,
& McKevitt, B. (2001). Experimental analysis of
the effects of testing accommodations on the scores
of students with and without disabilities.
Journal of School Psychology, 31(1),
3-24.
Florida Department of
Education. (1982). Florida Technical Report:
Study of procedural adaptation and format
modifications in testing learning disabled students
elementary level: Volume II. Tallahassee:
Author.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D.,
Eaton, S.B., Hamlett, C., & Karns, K. (2000).
Supplementing teacher judgements about test
accommodations with objective data sources.
School Psychology Review, 29 (1),
65-85.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D.,
Eaton, S.B., Hamlett, C., Binkley, E., &
Crouch, R. (2000). Using objective data source to
enhance teacher judgements about test
accommodations. Exceptional Children, 67
(1), 67-81.
Gajria, M., Salend, S.J.,
& Hemrick, M.A. (1994). Teacher acceptability
of testing modifications for mainstreamed students.
Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,
9(4), 236-243.
Gallina, N.B. (1989).
Tourette’s syndrome children: Significant
achievement and social behavior variables
(Tourette’s syndrome, attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder) (Doctoral dissertation,
City University of New York, 1989). Dissertation
Abstracts International, 50,
0046.
Gordon, R.P, Stump, K.,
& Glaser, B.A. (1996). Assessment of
individuals with hearing impairments: Equity in
testing procedures and accommodations. Measurement
and Evaluation in Counseling and Development,
29, 111-119.
Grise, P., Beattie, S., &
Algozzine, B. (1982). Assessment of minimum
competency in fifth grade learning disabled
students: Test modifications make a difference.
Journal of Educational Research, 76 (1),
35-40.
Hasselbring, T.S. &
Crossland, C.L. (1982). Application of
microcomputer technology to spelling assessment of
learning disabled students. Learning Disability
Quarterly, 5, 80-82.
Helwig, R., Stieber, S.,
Tindal, G., Hollenbeck, K., Heath, B., &
Almond, P. (2000). A comparison of factor analyses
of handwritten and word-processed writing of middle
school students. Eugene, OR: RCTP.
Hollenbeck, K., Tindal, G.,
& Almond, P. (1998). Teacher’s knowledge
of accommodations as a validity issue in
high-stakes testing. The Journal of Special
Education, 32 (3), 175-183.
Hollenbeck , K., Tindal, G.,
Harniss, M., & Almond, P. (1999). The effect of
using computers as an accommodation in a statewide
writing test. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon,
BRT.
Hollenbeck, K., Tindal, G.,
Stieber, S., & Harniss, M. (1999). Handwritten
vs. word processed statewide compositions: Do
judges rate them differently? Eugene, OR:
University of Oregon, BRT.
Horton, S.V., & Lovitt,
T.C. (1994). A comparison of two methods of
administering group reading inventories to diverse
learners: Computer versus pencil and paper.
Remedial and Special Education, 15 (6)
378-390.
Huesman, R.L. (1999). The
validity of ITBS reading comprehension test scores
for learning disabled and non-learning disabled
students under extended-time conditions. (Doctoral
dissertation, University of Iowa, 1999).
Dissertation Abstracts International, A 60/06,
1996.
Huesman, R.L., &
Frisbie, D.A. (2000). The validity of the ITBS
reading comprehension test scores for learning
disabled and non learning disabled students under
extended time conditions. Paper presented at the
annual meeting of the National Council on
Measurement in Education, New Orleans,
LA.
Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20
U.S.C. Sec. 1400 et seq.
Jayanthi, M., Epstein,
M.H., Polloway, E.A., & Bursuck, W.D. (1996). A
national survey of general education teachers’
perceptions of testing adaptations. The Journal of
Special Education, 30 (1), 99-115.
Koretz, D. (1997). The
assessment of students with disabilities in
Kentucky (CSE Technical Report No. 431). Los
Angeles, CA: Center for Research on Standards and
Student Testing.
Koretz, D. & Hamilton, L.
(1999). Assessing students with disabilities in
Kentucky: The effects of accommodations, format,
and subject (Technical Report No. 498). Los
Angeles, CA: Center for Research on Standards and
Student Testing. (ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No. ED 440 148).
Lambert, D., Dodd, J.M.,
Christensen, L., & Fishbaugh, M.S.E. (1996).
Rural secondary teachers’ willingness to
provide accommodations for students with learning
disabilities. Rural Special Education Quarterly,
15 (2), 36-42.
Lewis, D., Green, D. R.,
& Miller, L. (1999). Using differential item
functioning analyses to assess the validity of
testing accommodated students with
disabilities. Paper presented at the national
conference on large-scale assessment, Snowbird,
UT.
MacArthur, C.A., &
Graham, S. (1987). Learning disabled students’
composing under three methods of text production:
Handwriting, word processing, and dictation. The
Journal of Special Education, 21 (3),
22-42.
Marquart, A. (2000). The
use of extended time as an accommodation on a
standardized mathematics test: An investigation of
effects on scores and perceived consequences for
students of various skill levels. Paper
presented at the annual meeting of the Council of
Chief State School Officers, Snowbird,
UT.
Meloy, L.L., Deville, C.,
& Frisbie, C. (2000). The Effect of a Reading
Accommodation on Standardized Test Scores of
Learning Disabled and Non Learning Disabled
Students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of
the National Council on Measurement in Education
(New Orleans, LA).
Mick, L.B. (1989).
Measurement effects of modifications in minimum
competency test formats for exceptional students.
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and
Development, 22, 31-36.
Miller, P. (1990). Use of the
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT-R)
with individuals with severe speech and motor
impairment: Effect of response mode on test results
(Speech Impairment). (Doctoral Dissertation,
University of Kansas ,1990): Digital
Dissertations, 51, 5632.
Montani, T.O. (1995).
Calculation skills of third-grade children with
mathematics and reading difficulties (learning
disabilities). (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers the
State University of New Jersey, 1995).
Dissertation Abstracts International, 56,
0910.
Munger, G.F., & Loyd,
B.H. (1991). Effect of speededness on test
performance of handicapped and nonhandicapped
examinees. Journal of Educational Research, 85
(1), 53-57.
Murray, E.A. (1987). The
relationship between spatial abilities and
mathematics achievement in normal and
learning-disabled boys. (Doctoral dissertation,
Boston University, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts
International, 58, 0176.
Perez, J.V. (1980).
Procedural adaptations and format modifications in
minimum competency testing of learning disabled
students: A clinical investigation (Doctoral
dissertation, University of South Florida, 1980).
Dissertation Abstracts International, 41,
0206.
Perlman, C.L., Borger, J.,
Collins, C.B., Elenbogen, J.C., & Wood, J.
(1996). The effect of extended time limits on
learning disabled students’ scores on
standardized reading tests. Paper presented at
the annual meeting of the National Council on
Measurement in Education, New York, NY.
Petronio, K. (1998).
Interpreting for deaf-blind students: Factors to
consider. American Annals of the Deaf, 133
(3), 33-43.
Phillips, S.E. (1994). High
stakes testing accommodations: Validity vs.
disabled rights. Applied Measurement in
Education, 7 (2), 93-120.
Pomplun, M. & Omar, M. H.
(2000). Score comparability of a state mathematics
assessment across students with and without reading
accommodations. Journal of Applied Psychology,
85, 21-29.
Ray, S.R. (1989). Adapting
the WISC-R for deaf children. Diagnostique, 7,
147-157.
Ray, S.R. (1989). Context and
the psychoeducational assessment of hearing
impaired children. Topics in Language Disorders,
9(4) 33-43.
Rock, D.A., Bennett, R.E.,
& Jirele, T. (1988). Factor structure of the
Graduate Record Examinations General Test in
handicapped and nonhandicapped groups. Journal
of Applied Psychology, 73 (3),
383-392.
Rogers, W.T. (1983). Use of
separate answer sheets with hearing impaired and
deaf school age students. B.C. Journal of
Special Education, 7 (1), 63-72.
Russell, M. (1999). Testing
writing on computers: A follow-up study comparing
performance on computer and on paper.
Educational Policy Analysis Archives,
7.
Russell, M., & Haney, W.
(1997). Testing writing on computers: An experiment
comparing student performance on tests conducted
via computer and via paper-and-pencil.
Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 5
(3).
Russell, M., & Plati, T.
(2001). Effects of computer versus paper
administration of a state-mandated writing
assessment. TCRecord.org. Retrieved January
23, 2001, from the World Wide Web:
http://www.tcrecord.org/PrintContent.asp?ContentID=10709.
Statewide Stakeholder Focus
Group. (September, 1995) «Including Students
with Disabilities in Statewide Assessment and
Accountability Systems: A Study of the
Issues.» Under a grant from The Texas
Education Agency to Region XI Education Service
Center.
Sullivan, P.M. (1982).
Administration modifications on the WISC-R
Performance Scale with different categories of deaf
children. American Annals of the Deaf, 127
(6), 780-788.
Swain, C. R. (1997). A
comparison of a computer-administered test and a
paper and pencil test using normally achieving and
mathematically disabled young children. ( Doctoral
Dissertation, University of North Texas, 1997)
Digital Dissertations, 58, 835.
Thurlow, M., House, A., Boys,
C., Scott, D., & Ysseldyke, J. (2000). State
participation and accommodation policies for
students with disabilities: 1999 Update (Synthesis
Report 33). Minneapolis, MN: University of
Minnesota, National Center on Educational
Outcomes.
Tindal, G., & Fuchs, L.
(2000). A Summary of Research on Test
Accommodations: An Empirical Basis for Defining
Test Accommodations. Lexington, KY: Mid-South
Regional Resource Center. (ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. ED 442 245).
Tindal, G. Heath, B.,
Hollenbeck, K., Almond, P., & Harniss, M.
(1998). Accommodating students with disabilities on
large-scale tests: An empirical study of student
response and test administration demands.
Exceptional Children, 64 (4),
439-450.
Tippets, E., & Michaels,
H. (1997). Factor Structure Invariance of
Accommodated and Non-Accommodated Performance
Assessments. Paper presented at the National
Council on Measurement in Education annual meeting,
Chicago.
Tolfa-Veit, D., &
Scruggs, T.E. (1986). Can learning disabled
students effectively use separate answer sheets?
Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63,
155-160.
Trimble, S. (1998).
Performance trends and use of accommodations on
a statewide assessment (Maryland/Kentucky Report
Number 3). Minneapolis, MN: National Center on
Educational Outcomes.
Vacc, N. (1987). Word
processor versus handwriting: A comparative study
of writing samples produced by mildly mentally
handicapped students. Exceptional Children,
54(2), 156-165.
Varnhagen, S., & Gerber,
M.M. (1984). Use of microcomputers for spelling
assessment: Reasons to be cautious. Learning
Disability Quarterly, 7, 266-270.
Walz, L., Albus, D.,
Thompson, S., & Thurlow, M. (2000). Effect
of a multiple day test accommodation on the
performance of special education students
(Minnesota Report 34). Minneapolis: University
of Minnesota, National Center on Educational
Outcomes.
Watkins, M.W., & Kush,
J.C. (1988). Assessment of academic skills of
learning disabled students with classroom
microcomputers. School Psychology Review, 17
(1), 81-88.
Weston, T. (1999). The
validity of oral presentation in testing.
Montreal, CANADA: American Educational Research
Association.
Wright, N., & Wendler, C.
(1994). Establishing timing limits for the new SAT
for students with disabilities. Paper presented at
the Annual Meeting of the National Council on
Measurement in Education (New Orleans, LA, April
4-8, 1994). ERIC ID# ED375543.
Ziomek, R.L., & Andrews,
K.M. (1998). ACT assessment score gains of special
tested students. ACT Research Report Series,
October, 1998.
National Center
on Educational Outcomes Web site: http://education.umn.edu/NCEO
© 2002 by the Regents of the University of
Minnesota.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity
educator and employer.
Online
Privacy Statement
This page was last
updated on December 20, 2002.
This Web site is
produced by the National Center on Educational
Outcomes through a Cooperative Agreement
(#H326G000001) with the Research to Practice
Division, Office of Special Education Programs,
U.S. Department of Education. Opinions expressed in
this Web site do not necessarily reflect those of
the U.S. Department of Education or Offices within
it.
|
